313 F. Supp. 2d 423 - Marshall v. Hendricks’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “apparent plethora of potentially useful mitigation witnesses available to the defense at the time of the trial,”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. State v. Arthur · Marshall v. Cathel

2. “what he learned anecdotally from Dr. Walzer — that Marshall was narcissistic and manipulative, that he was behaving in a sexually provocative way with staff members and seemed to exhibit no remorse over the death of his wife. (Test. of Glenn Zeitz at A293.) 11 One aspect of Zeitz's pre-penalty performance the District Court found not to have fallen below constitutional standards was the failure to obtain records or documentary evidence of Marshall's charitable activities. On this point, the District Court concluded,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Marshall v. Cathel

3. “Although several Supreme Court decisions have applied Strickland to ineffective assistance of counsel claims at the sentencing phase of a capital trial, all are factually distinguishable from the present case.”); Bucklew v. Luebbers, 436 F.3d 1010 , 1014 n. 3 (8th Cir.2006) (Court agreed with district court’s interpretation that Wiggins did not establish a”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Loving v. United States