Wertz v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 170 Ga. App. 245 - Meyer v. Ledford · 242 Ga. App. 496 - Johnson v. Rodier · Campbell v. THE LANDINGS ASS'N, INC. · 295 Ga. App. 128 - Saye v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP · 249 Ga. App. 686 - Harris v. Distinctive Builders, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a false and defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff; (2) an unprivileged communication to a third party; (3) fault by the defendant amounting at least to negligence; and (4) special harm or the actionability of the statement irrespective of special harm.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a false representation by a defendant; scienter; intention to induce the plaintiff to act or refrain from acting; justifiable reliance by plaintiff; and damage to the plaintiff.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“communications which are afforded an absolute privilege cannot form the basis of a defamation action, regardless of the falsity of the statements or the speaker's malicious intent; conditionally privileged statements, on the other hand, are actionable upon a showing of malice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.