Muhl v. Magan’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably MacKlin v. Robert Logan Associates (1994), Zappone v. Liberty Life Insurance (1998)
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Garber v. United States · Oxtoby v. McGowan · Levitt & Sons, Inc. v. Division Against Discrimination in State Dept. of Ed. · Bd. of Ed. for Dorchester Co. v. Hubbard · Prince George's County v. Blumberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o insurer ... shall ... refuse to underwrite... a particular insurance risk ... except by the application of standards which are reasonably related to the insurer's economic and business purposes.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The agency action giving rise to the appeal to the circuit court was the denial of a preliminary hearing on Dr. Magan's complaint. That denial came about by operation of law due to the Division's inaction for thirty days following Dr. Magan's request of November 13, after he was aggrieved by the Chief Investigator's conclusion that there had been no violation. Thus, the issue on appeal should have been confined to whether the preliminary hearing was properly denied.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he Commissioner shall hold a hearing ... upon written demand therefor by a person aggrieved by any act, threatened act, or failure of the Commissioner to act.... [U]nless postponed by mutual consent, such hearing shall be held within thirty (30) consecutive calendar days after receipt by the Commissioner of demand therefor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.