Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 Mo. 426 - Benson v. Watkins

Benson v. Watkins’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 1986
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 1986

16 state decisions

601926193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Citizens Bank v. McElvain · Meek v. Hurst · Paul v. Fulton · Arnholt v. Hartwig

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule is universal that an agent authorized to sell property for another cannot himself be the purchaser, unless he discloses fully to his principal that he is the purchaser, revealing everything within his knowledge relating to the transaction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.