State v. Burdin’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2002
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · See v. City of Seattle · Henry v. United States · Frank v. Maryland · In Re Application of Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Protection of the victim [is] the clear and unequivocal message. Law enforcement personnel and the courts [are] encouraged to insure, indeed charged with insuring, the safety of all victims exposed to actual or potential acts of domestic violence or abuse." State v. Saavedra, 276 N.J.Super. 289, 292 , 647 A. 2d 1348 (App.Div.1994). The Act provides various civil and criminal remedies which highlight the judiciary's role in insuring the safety of domestic violence victims. State v. Solomon, 262 N.J.Super. 618, 621-622 , 621 A. 2d 559 (Ch.Div.1993). In this case, the police were taking steps to remove a firearm from the possession of a person in a potentially dangerous domestic violence situation. Their purpose was not to seek evidence of a crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.