Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 N.W.2d 38 - State v. Fox

State v. Fox’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
4
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably State v. Klaudt (2009), State v. Knecht (1997)

37 state decisions

24019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · State v. Johnson · State v. Reiman · State v. Shank & Bradley · State v. Minkel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not equate late disclosure with suppression, especially where ... the trial record indicates that defense counsel made use of the information at trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A witness is not an accomplice to a defendant simply because his distinct acts happen to constitute a like offense. Rather, it is necessary that a charge against that witness could have arisen from the same occurrence as the crime for which the defendant was tried.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice unless it is corroborated by other evidence which tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense. The corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense, or the circumstances thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.