State v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2021
1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because defendant has not asserted that any of the three jurors was actually biased or incapable of being an impartial juror, there can be no successful contention that defendant's state or federal constitutional rights to a fair and impartial jury were violated.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Amini · State v. Taylor“the analysis of the issue presented is the same under the statute and the state and federal constitutions, because defendant has 'not suggest[ed] any different analysis under the [statute and] Oregon Constitution than under the United States Constitution.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]n State v. Dewey, 206 Or. 496, 504-08 , 292 P.2d 799 (1956), this court held that ORS 43.160, which states a rule of issue preclusion that has its genesis in the common law, applies in criminal cases”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Boots
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.