Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 P.2d 784 - Wallace v. Williams

Wallace v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
September 1977
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 1977

10 state decisions

70195719601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alfe v. New York Life Ins. Co. · Holt v. Jones · Holt v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma County · Mileski v. Kerby · Seaborn v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As against a demurrer, a petition must be liberally construed, and all its allegations of fact must be taken as true, together with all reasonable inferences therefrom. If any fact stated therein entitled the plaintiff to any relief, the demurrer should be overruled.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.