313 Pa. Super. 47 - In Re Long’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 244 Pa. Super. 218 - In the Interest of LaRue · 257 Pa. Super. 468 - Scarlett v. Scarlett · 273 Pa. Super. 536 - In the Interest of Black · 244 Pa. Super. 396 - In Re Interest of Clouse · 268 Pa. Super. 447 - In the Interest of Pernishek
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party or litigant has the right to an in court presentation of evidence, such is essential to due process. Such report or letter cannot be received into evidence over objection in a custody matter unless its author is sworn, examined and subjected to cross-examination. Palmer v. Tokarek, 279 Pa.Super. 458 , 421 A.2d 289 (1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must be reasonably complete and the hearing judge must by his opinion give us the benefit of a thorough analysis of the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.