Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 So. 2d 692 - Estevez v. State

313 So. 2d 692 - Estevez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently December 1999 · most notably Borges v. State (1982), Dorfman v. State (1977)

51 state decisions

420197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yost v. State · 285 So. 2d 12 - Cone v. State · Benton v. Commonwealth · 74 Cal. App. 138 - People v. Snyder · Edmond v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We hold, therefore, that in light of the facts and circumstances of the instant case, the trial court erred imposing sentence of fifteen years on petitioner's conviction of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony, and imposing an additional concurrent sentence of five years on petitioner's conviction of possession of burglary tools. In a case such as this, only one sentence may be imposed, and that sentence, obviously, cannot exceed that which could be imposed solely upon conviction for the highest offense contained within the transaction. We therefore must reverse the First District on this point."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * * * * "In Florida, where an information contains more than one count, but each is a facet or phase of the same transaction, only one sentence may be imposed; and the sentence which should be imposed is for the highest offense charged." * * * * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “breaking and entering and grand larceny are separate offenses, not facets of the same transaction, and that two separate sentences may be imposed upon conviction of the two offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.