Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 So. 2d 812 - Johnson v. Pearce

313 So. 2d 812 - Johnson v. Pearce’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 637 So. 2d 127 - Montalvo v. Sondes (1994), 935 So. 2d 669 - Kennedy v. Sheriff of East Baton Rouge (2006)

1 federal appellate · 57 state decisions

23019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 114

Relies on Bell v. Burson · Hannah v. Larche · Carter v. Carter Coal Co. · United States v. Rock Royal Co-Op Noyes · United States v. Shreveport Grain & Elevator Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in order to sustain them, a clear case must be established, where the forms of justice have been perverted to the gratification of private malice and the willful oppression of the innocent.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) The commencement or continuance of an original criminal or civil judicial proceeding. (2) Its legal causation by the present defendant against plaintiff who was defendant in the original proceeding. (3) Its bona fide termination in favor of the present plaintiff. (4) The absence of probable cause for such proceeding. (5) The presence of malice therein. (6) Damage conforming to legal standards resulting to plaintiff.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““A. Any person owning or having charge of any male or female cattle over eight months of age in a herd which has shown evidence of brucellosis infection, or has intermingled with or otherwise been exposed to brucellosis infected animals, upon at least thirty days prior written notification by an authorized agent of the Livestock Sanitary Board shall pre sent and restrain the cattle for identification and testing, * * * “B. Evidence of infection includes finding one or more reactors to an official brucellosis agglutination test on animals bred on the farm, at livestock auction market, at a slaughter establishment or concentration point, * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.