Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 SW2D 99 - Bailey v. Mullens

Bailey v. Mullens’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2014

7 state decisions

201958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Harrison · Knight v. Chicago Corp. · Texas Electric Railway Co. v. Neale · Newton v. Emerson, Talcott & Co. · Vineyard v. O'Connor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An instrument is that which its language shows it to be, without regard to what it is labelled.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.