Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 U.S. 215 - Sampsell v. Imperial Paper & Color Corp.

Sampsell v. Imperial Paper & Color Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

313 U.S. 215 · 1941

Citation profile

691
cited by 691 later decisions
25
cited 25 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

158 federal appellate · 35 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 691 later decisions (25 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2019 · most notably Katchen v. Landy (1966), Nathanson v. National Labor Relations Board (1952)

158 federal appellate · 35 district · 26 state decisions

182019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedImperial Paper & Color Corp. v. Sampsell (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Pepper v. Litton · Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co. · Moore v. Bay Estate of Sassard & Kimball · Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. Fox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 691 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The power of the bankruptcy court to subordinate claims or adjudicate equities arising out of the relationship between the several creditors is complete.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “mere legal paraphernalia will not suffice to transform into a substantial adverse claimant a corporation whose affairs are so closely assimilated to the affairs of the dominant stockholder that in substance it is little more than his corporate pocket.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “found ... that [a] corporation was 'nothing but a sham and a cloak' devised by [the debtor] 'for the purpose of preserving and conserving his assets' for the benefit of himself and his family[ ] and that the corporation was formed for the purpose of hindering, delaying and defrauding his creditors”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.