Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 U.S. 28 - Hort v. Commissioner

Hort v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

313 U.S. 28 · 1941

Citation profile

722
cited by 722 later decisions
18
cited 18 times by the Supreme Court
October 2015
most recently cited

395 federal appellate · 11 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 722 later decisions (18 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2015 · most notably Corn Products Refining Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1955), Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Transport, Inc. (1960)

395 federal appellate · 11 district ·

254019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedWarren Service Corp. v. Commissioner (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Helvering v. Horst · Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co. · United States v. S S White Dental Mfg Co of Pennsylvania · United States v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 722 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where, as in this case, the disputed amount was essentially a substitute for rental payments which § 22(a) expressly characterizes as gross income, it must be regarded as ordinary income, ° and it is immaterial that for some purposes the contract creating the right to such payments may be treated as ‘property’ or ‘capital.’ ””
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “involved nothing more than the relinquishment of the right to future rental payments in return for a present substitute payment and possession of the leased premises.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “indicates that Congress intended to allow * * * [the taxpayer] to reduce ordinary income actually received and reported by the amount of income he failed to realize.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.