Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 U.S. 283 - City of New York v. Feiring

City of New York v. Feiring’s Empirical Analysis

313 U.S. 283 · 1941

Citation profile

462
cited by 462 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

107 federal appellate · 18 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 462 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2019 · most notably United States v. Reorganized CF&I Fabricators of Utah, Inc. (1996), Unio Pac Co v. United States (1941)

107 federal appellate · 18 district · 10 state decisions

183019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedCity of New York v. Feiring (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Burnet v. Harmel · Morgan v. Commissioner · Palmer v. Bender · New Jersey v. Anderson · Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 462 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “extends to those pecuniary burdens laid upon individuals or their property, regardless of their consent, for the purpose of defraying the expenses of government or of undertakings authorized by it.”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “not to learn whether they have denominated the obligation a `tax' but to ascertain whether its incidents are such as to constitute a tax within the meaning of § 64”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “by the particular characterization by local law or the state's demand”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.