Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 313 U.S. 69 - Skiriotes v. Florida

Skiriotes v. Florida’s Empirical Analysis

313 U.S. 69 · 1941

Citation profile

472
cited by 472 later decisions
88
cited 88 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

87 federal appellate · 49 district · 144 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 472 later decisions (88 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2022 · most notably West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), Lauritzen v. Larsen (1953)

87 federal appellate · 49 district · 144 state decisions — followed in 16 states

1060194119501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simpson v. Shepard · Aaron Cooley v. The Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia to the Use of the Society for the Relief of Distressed Pilots Their Widows and Children Same · American Banana Company v. United Fruit Company · Blackmer v. United States · Savage v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 472 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the United States may control the conduct of its citizens upon the high seas, we see no reason why the State of Florida may not likewise govern the conduct of its citizens upon the high seas with respect to matters in which the State has a legitimate interest and where there is no conflict with acts of Congress.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The United States is not debarred by any rule of international law from governing the conduct of its own citizens upon the high seas or even in foreign countries when the rights of other nations or their nationals are not infringed.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “No right of a citizen of any other state is here asserted. The question is solely between appellant and his own state.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.