Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 314 ARK 531 - Phillips v. State

Phillips v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gruzen v. State · Davasher v. State · Campbell v. State · Hodge v. State · Tisdale v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution that at the time the defendant engaged in the conduct charged, he lacked capacity, as a result of mental disease or defect, to conform his conduct to the requirements of law or to appreciate the criminality of his conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.