Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 314 F.2d 293 - Brown v. United States

Brown v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

314 F.2d 293 · 1963

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
4
states following
December 1992
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently December 1992 · most notably United States v. Plattner (1964), United States v. Mills (1979)

38 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

2101963197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2421 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 28 U.S.C. § 753

Relies on Hill v. United States · Remmer v. United States · Viereck v. United States · Killian v. United States · United States v. Shotwell Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . .we would think failure to record counsel’s summation, without more, though error ‘is an error which is neither jurisdictional nor constitutional. It is not a fundamental defect which inherently results in a complete miscarriage of justice, nor an omission inconsistent with the rudimentary demands of fair procedure.’ ” (Quoting Hill v. United States 368 U.S. 424 , 82 S.Ct. 468 , 7 L.Ed.2d 417 [1962].)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he appropriate procedure is to vacate the judgment and remand for a hearing to determine whether appellant was prejudiced by the error in failing to record the arguments. If the trial court concludes that he was, a new trial may be ordered. If the court concludes that he was not, a new final judgment may be entered.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “all proceedings in criminal cases had in open court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.