Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 314 F.2d 369 - Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Platt

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Platt’s Empirical Analysis

314 F.2d 369 · 1963

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 1984
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1984

6 federal appellate ·

70196319701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Beck v. Washington · Armour Packing Company v. United States · United States v. Johnson · Travis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) location of corporate defendant; (2) location of possible witnesses; (3) location of events likely to be in issue; (4) location of documents and records likely to be involved; (5) disruption of defendant’s business unless the case is transferred; (6) expense to the parties; (7) location of counsel; (8) relative accessibility of place of trial; (9) docket condition of each district or division involved; and (10) any other special elements which might affect the transfer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The underlying spirit of the constitutional concern for trial in the vicinage of the defendant, rooted in centuries of Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence and universally recognized by the federal courts, is not to be ignored.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.