Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 314 F.2d 407 - Silverii v. Kramer

Silverii v. Kramer’s Empirical Analysis

314 F.2d 407 · 1963

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently March 1995 · most notably Williamson v. Consolidated Rail Corp. (1991), Neville Chemical Co. v. Union Carbide Corp. (1970)

25 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

2201963197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. · Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad · Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Duncan · Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc. · Galloway v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(I)f the evidence is of such a character that reasonable men, in the impartial exercise of their judgment may reach different conclusions, the case should be submitted to the jury.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is well settled that the granting or refusing of a new trial is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the trial judge and his action thereon is not reviewable upon appeal, save in the most exceptional cases”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is a matter of federal procedure and is, in no wise, subject to state practice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.