Deaton Truck Line, Inc. v. Local Union 612’s Empirical Analysis
314 F.2d 418 · 1963
Citation profile
55 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2018 · most notably John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston (1964), Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc. (1996)
55 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Oliver · Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local Unions Nos. 128 & 633 v. Lion Dry Goods, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an agreement between employers and labor organizations significant to the maintenance of labor peace between them,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"Appellant argues that the use of the word `may' in the contract prevents arbitration from being compulsory or obligatory. Clearly, however, `may' should be construed to give either aggrieved party the option to require arbitration. United Steelworkers of America v. American Mfg. Co., 1960, 363 U.S. 564, 565, n. 1 , 80 S.Ct. 1343 [1345] 4 L.Ed.2d 1403 ; International Association of Machinists, AFLCIO v. Hayes Corp., 5th Cir., 1961, 296 F.2d 238, 241, n. 6 ." Id. at 422.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) Suits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization representing employees in an industry affecting commerce as defined in this chapter, or between any such labor organizations, may be brought in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the parties, without respect to the amount in controversy or without regard to the citizenship of the parties.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.