Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 314 F.2d 664 - Lam Man Chi v. Bouchard

Lam Man Chi v. Bouchard’s Empirical Analysis

314 F.2d 664 · 1963

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
June 2006
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2006

15 federal appellate · 3 district ·

13019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Rector Etc of Holy Trinity Church v. United States · Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp. · Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The procedure prescribed by, and all the provisions of sections 1031-1042 of Title 5, shall apply to, and shall be the sole and exclusive procedure for, the judicial review of all final orders of deportation * * * made against aliens within the United States pursuant to administrative proceedings under section 1252(b) of this title [§ 242(b) of the Act] or comparable provisions of any prior Act * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.