Anderson v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 federal appellate · 11 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]he public must be given an opportunity to comment on draft EAs and EISs.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. California Trout v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission · Native Ecosystems Council v. Erickson

2. “Delete “While this clause does not strip Indians of the substance of their treaty rights, see Washington v. Washington Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass’n, 443 U.S. 658 , 677 n. 22, 99 S.Ct. 3055 , 61 L.Ed.2d 823 (1979), it does prevent Indians from relying on treaty rights to deprive other citizens of a fair apportionment of a resource, see id. at 683-84 , 99 S.Ct. 3055 . Moreover, the clause means we must consider the status of non-Indians when we assess the scope of the Tribe’s treaty rights.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Anderson v. Evans · Anderson v. Evans

3. “and place the burden of demonstrating objective evaluation on the government. See Metcalf, 214 F.3d at 1146 . We find it unnecessary to apply this directive from Metcalf, because we conclude in this section that NEPA was violated based on the traditional standard of review set forth above. 12 . The government’s calculation of the acceptable Potential Biological Removal level (”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Anderson v. Evans · Anderson v. Evans