Dubuc v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
314 F.3d 1205 · 2003
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2023
12 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Borden Co. · Parissi v. Telechron, Inc. · Haynes v. Williams · Mesrop Martirosyan v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · United States of America v. David Meyers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“justify the judicial repeal of § 1915(g)'s `in no event' language”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.