Angel v. Kentucky’s Empirical Analysis
314 F.3d 262 · 2002
Citation profile
19 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Weiner Dpm v. Klais and Company Inc · Miller v. Currie · Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. · Wilson-Jones v. Caviness
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We must therefore address the jurisdictional [Eleventh Amendment] question that clearly exists, even though it was not addressed by the court below.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.