Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 314 F.3d 283 - Johansen v. Barnhart

Johansen v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

314 F.3d 283 · 2002

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Clifford v. Apfel · Zurawski v. Halter · Diaz v. Chater · Meredith v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence is `substantial' if it is sufficient for a reasonable person to accept as adequate to support the decision.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “All that is required is that the hypothetical question [to the VE] be supported by the medical evidence in the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.