Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 314 F.3d 567 - Davis v. C

Davis v. C’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
August 2020
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2020

50200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Sublett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A Chapter 13 plan of confirmation has res judicata effect unless it is subsequently modified by a bankruptcy court order. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1327 , 1329. The confirmation plan includes, inter alia, the claim amounts that will be paid to each creditor, therefore, the alteration of an amount to be distributed to a creditor is a modification of that plan. 11 U.S.C. § 1329 (a). Section 1329 sets forth the means by which a modification may be obtained and provides that the confirmation plan may be modified upon request by the trustee, debtor, or holder of an unsecured claim. Id. The “request” language of § 1329(a) presupposes that such request must be accepted or denied by order of the bankruptcy court. Absent bankruptcy court order of modification, the confirmation plan must be executed as originally approved. § 1327(a).. .[a]bsent a request by a proper party (i.e. the trustee) and consideration and approval by the bankruptcy court, the trustee’s modification of the Plan was invalid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.