Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

314 F.3d 995

Docket No. 99-71546.

Chen v. Ashcroft

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 12, 2002.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2002-12-12

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Li Chen Zheng v. Ashcroft (2003), Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc. (2011)

20 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Kitsap Physicians Service · Jian Chen v. Ashcroft

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-12-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Darrel Jackson, Jack E. Brown, Dan L. Bagatell, Brown & Bain, P.A., Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner.

¶2Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Phoenix, AZ, Alison R. Drucker, Matthew R. Hall, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

¶3Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, NOONAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER

¶5In light of the representations in the government’s brief of November 8, 2002 and the fact that the Board of Immigration Appeals appeared ready to grant asylum to the petitioner until more briefing was sought here, we vacate our decision of May 13, 2002, and remand this case to the Board.

/314/f3d/995 · .json · Public domain