Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 314 Ga. App. 67 - Walker v. State

314 Ga. App. 67 - Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 225 Ga. App. 792 - Pickens v. State · Duncan v. State · 240 Ga. App. 774 - Green v. State · 257 Ga. App. 480 - Gaston v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hile a trial court’s findings as to disputed facts will be reviewed to determine whether the ruling was clearly erroneous, where the evidence is uncontroverted and no question regarding the credibility of witnesses is presented, the trial court’s application of the law to undisputed facts is subject to de novo appellate review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “United States Supreme Court holdings sculpt out, at least theoretically, three tiers of police-citizen encounters: (1) communication between police and citizens involving no coercion or detention and therefore without the compass of the Fourth Amendment, (2) brief seizures that must be supported by reasonable suspicion, and (3) full-scale arrests that must be supported by probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The deputy was entitled to approach the apartment, knock on the door, speak with the occupants at the doorway, and request identification even if he did not have reasonable suspicion at that point, given that these actions did not go beyond a first-tier consensual encounter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.