314 Ill. App. 3d 1059 - People v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2007
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · Cady v. Dombrowski · 137 Ill. 2d 382 - People v. Murray · 186 Ill. 2d 501 - People v. Brownlee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Were [Officers] Jensen and Ambrosini allowed to question [Bailey] about his own criminality, and then search his pocket for illegal items, when their justification for detaining him was to prevent interference with Keese's arrest? [[Image here]] In the instant case, the justification given by Jensen and Ambrosini for detaining [Bailey] was to prevent him from interfering with Keese's arrest. They operated within the bounds of that justification when they stood in front of [Bailey] and prevented him from leaving the kitchen. The record shows that no further action was needed to accomplish [the officers'] purpose. Nevertheless, the officers expanded the seope of [Bailey's] detention by questioning him about his own criminality and searching him for illegal items. This conduct was unrelated to Keese's arrest and did not facilitate their original goal of merely preventing interference with execution of the warrant. We thus [uphold the lower court's] finding that [Bailey's] fourth amendment rights were violated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Way v. State“In Terry v. Ohio, the United States Supreme Court explained that the reasonableness of such a detention is determined by ascertaining (1) "whether the officer's action was justified at its inception," and (2) "whether [the officer's action] was reasonably related in scope to the cireum-stances which justified the interference in the first place." ... The Terry standard applies to a detention occurring within a residence after police officers have legitimately entered the residence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Way v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.