Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 314 MASS 504 - Rummel v. Peters

Rummel v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
2
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

5 district · 80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably Hoffman v. City of Chelsea (1943), National Shawmut Bank v. Joy (1944)

5 district · 80 state decisions

21019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wong Kim Ark · State of Texas v. State of Florida · Margaret Williamson v. Katherine Osenton · District of Columbia v. Murphy · Lem Moon Sing v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Residence is a word of varied meanings, ranging from domicil down to personal presence with some slight degree of permanence ... It means ‘in general a personal presence at some place of abode with no present intention of definite and early removal and with a purpose to remain for an undetermined period, not infrequently but not necessarily combined with a design to stay permanently. ’ Jenkins v. North Shore Dye House, Inc., 277 Mass. 440 , 444” Rummel v. Peters, 314 Mass. 504 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““the place of one’s actual residence with intention to remain permanently or for an indefinite time and without any certain purpose to return to a former place of abode.” Rummel v. Peters, 314 Mass. 504, 512 , 51 N.E.2d 57, 62 (1943).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.