Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 314 Md. 96 - State v. Bittinger

State v. Bittinger’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2015

10 state decisions

601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Kercheval v. United States · Sweetwine v. State · Sutton v. State · 52 Md. App. 440 - Rojas v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant may mount a challenge to the plea with the trial court during the time the case remains within that court’s jurisdiction, and may thereafter seek to challenge the plea in the appellate courts. A defendant successful in challenging the plea must realize, however, that the remedy is ordinarily to place the parties in their original position.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.