Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 314 NJSUPER 254 - State v. McCague

State v. McCague’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Lambert v. People of the State of California · Liparota v. United States · United States v. Shabani

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Legislature has the power to impose criminal liability regardless of a defendant's motive or state of mind and has done so here in the effort to combat the scourge of the manufacturing, distribution and use of controlled dangerous substances.... [A]ssertions of good motive or humanitarian concern ... do not vitiate a [statute] specifying actions constituting criminal conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.