State v. Langley’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2019
4 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“legitimate complaint concerning [appointed counsel]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“On review of an OEC 104(1) ruling, this court accepts reasonable factual inferences that the trial judge could have made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an individual who specializes in compiling potentially mitigating information about the accused in a capital case”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bocharski
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.