State v. Noble’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the person or things to be seized.” Minn. Const, art. I, § 10. The minor differences between the state and federal provisions do not affect our interpretation in this case. 3 . One of the illustrations of this principle provided by the Oregon Supreme Court is particularly relevant to the present case:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Mohs

2. “In this case, a warrant issued, and there is no claim that the warrant did not satisfy federal statutory requirements. The INS agent, therefore, had authorization from a politically accountable lawmaker [9] to arrest defendant pursuant to the warrant. Defendant argues that the federal administrative arrest warrant is invalid under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, because it was not supported by an”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Rodriguez