314 Pa. Super. 31 - Gee v. Gee’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably 318 Pa. Super. 311 - Wolk v. Wolk (1983), 316 Pa. Super. 282 - Ruth v. Ruth (1983)
69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 310 Pa. Super. 23 - Remick v. Remick · Bacchetta v. Bacchetta · 309 Pa. Super. 16 - Platek v. Platek
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(e) For purposes of this chapter only, “marital property” means all property acquired by either party during the marriage except: 4c * * sfs * * (3) Property acquired by gift, bequest, devise or descent except for the increase in value during the marriage. 4c 4< 4< 4c 4c 4c (f) All property, whether real or personal, acquired by either party during the marriage is presumed to be marital property regardless of whether title is held individually or by the parties in some form of co-ownership such as joint tenancy, tenancy in common or tenancy by the entirety. The presumption of marital property is overcome by a showing that the property was acquired by a method listed in subsection (e).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Effectuate economic justice between parties who are divorced or separated and apart or withhold alimony according to the actual need and ability to pay of the parties and insure a fair and just determination and settlement of their property rights. To this end, Section 401(d) provides: (d) In a proceeding for divorce or annulment, the court shall, upon request of either party, equitably divide, distribute or assign the marital property between the parties without regard to marital misconduct in such proportions as the court deems just after considering all relevant factors including: (1) The length of the marriage. (2) Any prior marriage of either party. (3) The age, health, station, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability, estate, liabilities and needs of each of the parties. (4) The contribution by one party to the education, training, or increased earning power of the other party. (5) The opportunity of each party for future acquisitions of capital assets and income. (6) The sources of income of both parties, including but not limited to medical, retirement, insurance or other benefits. (7) The contribution or dissipation of each party in the acquisition, preservation, depreciation or appreciation of the marital property, including the contribution of a party as homemaker. (8) The value of the property set apart to each party. (9) The standard of living of the parties established during the marriage. (10) The economic circumstances of each party at t”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Property acquired by gift, bequest, devise or descent except for the increase in value during the marriage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.