Barish v. Barish’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 279 Pa. Super. 179 - Hankin v. Hankin · Reynolds Metals Co. v. Berger · Mamula v. UNITED STEELWORKERS of A. · Pubusky v. D.M.F., Inc. · Surco Products, Inc. v. Kieszek
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nothing in any of the described Agreements or in this Order shall in any way affect such claims or obligations as may be held or due from Marvin J. Levin and all proceedings are without prejudice to such rights as he may have.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Levin v. Barish
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.