Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 314 So. 2d 171 - Dames v. State

314 So. 2d 171 - Dames v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 1990
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1990

8 state decisions

40197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Colburn v. City of Lakeland · Weeks v. State · 262 So. 2d 910 - Luster v. State · 223 So. 2d 112 - Wright v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court is committed to the rule that a new trial will not be granted for newly discovered evidence unless such evidence was discovered after the former trial, that due diligence must have been shown to have it at the former trial, that it must be material to the issue, it must go to the merits of the case, it must not be cumulative and it must be such as would produce a different verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.