Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

314 So. 2d 761

Lassitter v. Walton

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 5, 1975

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1975-06-05

Relies on 314 So. 2d 762 - Rinaldi v. Aaron · International Union of Operating Engineers v. Lassitter

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1975-06-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 1994

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

50197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Earl Lowell LASSITTER, Petitioner,
v.
Dennis WALTON, Respondent.
Earl Lowell LASSITTER, Petitioner,
v.
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO. 675, Respondent.
Earl Lowell LASSITTER, Petitioner,
v.
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, Respondent.
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, Petitioner,
v.
Earl Lowell LASSITTER et al., Respondents.

Nos. 45810-45812, 45818.

¶1Supreme Court of Florida.

April 30, 1975.
Rehearing Granted June 5, 1975.

¶2Rex Conrad, Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

¶3J. Leonard Fleet, Hollywood, for respondent-Walton.

¶4Larry Klein, Cone, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson & McKeown, West Palm Beach, and Woll, Mayer & Gold, Washington, D.C., for respondent-International Union of Operating Engineers.

¶5Thomas J. Pilacek, Mamber, Gopman, Epstein & Foosaner, North Miami Beach, for respondent-International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 675.

¶6

ORDER

¶7Certiorari is granted and the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal 295 So.2d 634 is quashed on the basis of Rinaldi v. Aaron, 314 So.2d 762, decided by this Court today, April 30, 1975.

¶8On consideration of the Petition for Clarification and/or Rehearing filed by International Union of Operating Engineers, it is ordered that said petition is granted, and it is further ordered:

¶9This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Cross-Petition for Writ of Certiorari, jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Florida Appellate Rule 4.5, subd. c(6), and it appearing to the Court that it is without jurisdiction, it is ordered that the Petition and Cross-Petition for Writ of Certiorari be and the same are hereby denied.

¶10ADKINS, C.J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.

¶11

ON REHEARING GRANTED

¶12Petitions for Certiorari are granted and the decision of the Fourth District Court of the record deemed necessary to reflect sistent with Rinaldi v. Aaron, 314 So.2d 762, decided by this Court April 30, 1975, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

¶13It is so ordered.

¶14ADKINS, C.J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.

¶15The Cross-Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed in the above cases is hereby denied.

¶16ADKINS, C.J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.

/314/so2d/761 · .json · Public domain