314 So. 2d 812 - Harrison v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2008
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strauss v. Strauss · Bosem v. Bosem · 277 So. 2d 266 - Ryan v. Ryan · 84 So. 2d 17 - Lindley v. Lindley · 312 So. 2d 792 - Hendricks v. Hendricks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court's judgment in finding that the marriage was irretrievably broken is clothed with a presumption of correctness, and this court may not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact without a clear showing of error. Therefore, we must view the record of the evidence before the trial judge in a light most favorable to his findings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.