Pink v. Aaa Highway Express’s Empirical Analysis
314 U.S. 201 · 1941
Citation profile
50 federal appellate · 6 district · 76 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 197 later decisions (33 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2019 · most notably Williams v. State of North Carolina (1942), United States v. Pink (1942)
50 federal appellate · 6 district · 76 state decisions — followed in 23 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Industrial Accident Commission · Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co. · Home Ins Co v. Dick · Pacific Employers Ins Co v. Industrial Accident Commission of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 197 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t was the purpose of that provision to preserve rights acquired or confirmed under the public acts and judicial proceedings of one state by requiring recognition of their validity in others.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““1. The Insured is hereby notified that by virtue of this Policy he is a member of the Auto Mutual Indemnity Company and is entitled to vote either in person or by proxy at any and all meetings of said company. “2. The annual meetings are held at the Home Office of the Company in New York City on the Second Tuesday of January in each year, at twelve o ’clock noon. “3. The contingent liability of the named Insured under this Policy shall be limited to one year from the expiration or cancellation hereof and shall not exceed the limits provided by the Insurance Law of the State of New York or of the State in which the Insured is domiciled and/or this policy is written. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he Full Faith and Credit Clause does not compel `a state to substitute the statutes of other states for its own statutes dealing with a subject matter concerning which it is competent to legislate.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.