Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 315 Ark. 338 - Cox v. McLaughlin

Cox v. McLaughlin’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably Wallace v. Broyles (1998), Young v. Paxton (1994)

7 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

280199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Vance · Cordes v. Outdoor Living Center, Inc. · W. R. Grimshaw Company and National Surety Corporation v. Nevil C. Withrow Co., Inc. · Tullock v. Eck · Hollingsworth v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO. OF ROGERS

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The standard of review in these cases is well settled. Summary judgment should be granted only when it is clear that there are no genuine issues of material fact to be resolved. If there is any doubt as to whether there are issues to be tried, the motion should be denied. In this case the defendants, as the moving parties, bore the burden of showing that there were no genuine issues of material fact. Plaintiff is entided to have all doubts and inferences resolved in his favor, and summary judgment is not proper if reasonable minds could reach different conclusions when given the facts. Tullock v. Eck, 311 Ark. 564 , 785 S.W.2d 31 (1993).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “show that the duress resulted from the other party’s wrongful and oppressive conduct, and not by his own necessity. In addition, he must show that the wrongful conduct deprived him of his own free will and volition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a state of facts or credible information which would induce an ordinarily cautious person to believe that the accused is guilty of the crimes charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.