Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 315 ARK 398 - Harris v. State

Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 1996
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kitchen v. State · Missildine v. State · Vickers v. State · Jones v. Reed · Watson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We note that in his reply brief, Harris requested that he be permitted to supplement his abstract, but that request was without a prior timely motion, and as a matter of course, would not (and did not) come to the court’s attention until after this case was submitted to the court for decision. It is not permissible to supply a deficiency in the abstract of the record in a reply brief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.