In Re Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 110 · 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Diamond Mortgage Corp. v. Sugar · United Liberty Life Insurance v. Ryan · Medical Mutual of Ohio v. DeSoto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A bankruptcy petition preparer who prepares a document for filing shall sign the document and print on the document the preparer's name and address ...” and § 110(c)(1), which provides:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Herrera
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.