Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 315 F.2d 266 - United States v. Zambito

United States v. Zambito’s Empirical Analysis

315 F.2d 266 · 1963

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
3
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. Pederson (1977), United States v. Marchisio (1965)

38 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

240196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 26 U.S.C. § 4411 · 26 U.S.C. § 4412

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Pereira v. United States · Abbate v. United States · United State v. Kahriger · Ogden v. United States

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.