Parrish v. Small’s Empirical Analysis
315 F.3d 1131 · 2003
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Early v. Packer · Jeffries v. Wood · Wildman v. Johnson · Ghent v. Woodford · Rhoden v. Rowland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]his case would benefit from additional information.... [The petitioner] should have been permitted to develop the record on the issue.... We vacate the judgment in district court and remand for an evidentiary hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.