Chapman v. Casner’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 103
Relies on Eli Lilly And Company v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. · Titanium Metals Corporation of America v. Donald W. Banner, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks · In re May · In re DBC · Medichem Sa v. Rolabo Sl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] process for preparing oxycodone or an oxycodone salt,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.