Learning Care Group, Inc. v. Armetta’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2074
Relies on Kronisch v. United States · Fujitsu Ltd. v. Federal Express Corp. · Residential Funding Corporation v. Degeorge Financial Corp., Degeorge Home Alliance, Inc. And Degeorge Capital Corp · West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. · Chin v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in deciding whether and how to sanction parties for spoliation of evidence. See West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. , 167 F.3d 776 , 779 (2d Cir. 1999). To obtain sanctions based on the spoliation of evidence, the movant must show”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Coan v. Dunne“the destroying party 'acted with the intent to deprive another party of the information's use in the litigation'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Coan v. Dunne“made a significant change to the standards governing spoliation issues”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Coan v. Dunne
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.