Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 315 Md. 224 - Sorrell v. State

Sorrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Bedford v. State (1989), State v. Simms (2011)

35 state decisions

12019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Laverick v. United States · Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Reddish · Tichnell v. State · Huffington v. Maryland · Hunt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The flight doctrine has been applied to a broad spectrum of behavior occurring after the commission of a crime: ‘flight from the scene or from one’s usual haunts after the crime, assuming a false name, shaving off a beard, resisting arrest, attempting to bribe arresting officers, forfeiture of bond by failure to appear, escapes or attempted escapes from confinement, and attempts of the accused to take his own life.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The instruction at issue in the present case provided: A person’s flight or concealment immediately after the commission of a crime or after being accused of committing a crime is not enough to establish guilt, but it is a fact that may be considered by you as evidence of guilt.... Flight under these circumstances may be motivated by a variety of factors, some of which may be fully consistent with innocence. You must first decide whether there’s evidence of flight. If you decide there’s evidence of flight, you must then decide whether this flight shows a consciousness of guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Here, a criminal defendant under bond absented himself from trial, did so without explanation either through counsel or by personal notification, was not located after a conscientious investigation, failed to meet his mother for a scheduled lunch and was identified by an eyewitness shortly before the defendant absented himself from the courtroom.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.