Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 315 N.C. 191 - State v. Fields

State v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

144
cited by 144 later decisions
4
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 142 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 144 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably State v. Holden (1987), State v. Barden (2002)

2 federal appellate · 142 state decisions

5901985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bullard · Beal v. Franklin · State v. Goodman · State v. Hutchins · State v. Silhan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 144 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A killing is committed in the perpetration or attempted perpetration for the purposes of the felony murder rule where there is no break in the chain of events leading from the initial felony to the act causing death so that the homicide is part of [a] series of incidents which form one continuous transaction.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t makes no difference whether the intent to steal was formulated before the use of force or after it, so long as the theft and the use or threat of force can be perceived by the jury as constituting a single transaction.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) want of provocation on the part of the deceased; (2) the conduct and statements of the defendant before and after the killing; (3) threats and declarations of the defendant before and during the course of the occurrence giving rise to the death of the deceased; (4) ill-will or previous difficulty between the parties; (5) the dealing of lethal blows after the deceased has been felled and rendered helpless; and (6) evidence that the killing was done in a brutal manner.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.